NVIDIA Tesla K20X vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla K20X and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla K20X 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Lower TDP (150W vs 235W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla K20X
+10%
3.935 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2012
Release Date
Jul 2014
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
667 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
249.6GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
2688
Shading Units
2304
224
TMUs
192
48
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
40.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
164.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.935 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
1312 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
235W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK110
GPU Name
GK110B
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.5
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
