Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K20X vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

NVIDIA Tesla K20X vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla K20X and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K20X 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K20X +1017%
3.935 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700M
0.352 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Aug 2008
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
249.6GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
2688
Shading Units
128
224
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

40.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.800 GPixel/s
164.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.935 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
1312 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM3
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Board Design

235W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy