Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K20X vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

NVIDIA Tesla K20X vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla K20X and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K20X 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2656 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K20X +4818%
3.935 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Jun 2007
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
249.6GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
2688
Shading Units
32
224
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

40.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
164.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.935 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
1312 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Board Design

235W
TDP
50W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy