Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K20X vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

NVIDIA Tesla K20X vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla K20X and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K20X 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K20X +709%
3.935 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000
0.486 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Nov 2010
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
249.6GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
8
-
Compute Units
-
2688
Shading Units
256
224
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

40.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
164.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.935 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
1312 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-825-A3
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

235W
TDP
142W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy