Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K20s vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Tesla K20s vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Tesla K20s and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K20s 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
2464 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K20s +4183%
2.87 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2013
Release Date
Sep 2008
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
320bit
Memory Bus
128bit
208.0GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
2496
Shading Units
32
208
TMUs
16
40
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
1280 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

29.90 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
119.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.870 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
956.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
42W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy