NVIDIA Tesla K20m vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Tesla K20m and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla K20m 's Advantages
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
Lower TDP (55W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla K20m
+150%
3.524 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2013
Release Date
Dec 2015
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1029 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
128bit
208.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
2496
Shading Units
640
208
TMUs
40
40
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
36.71 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
146.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.92 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.524 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1405 GFLOPS
1175 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.92 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
55W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK110
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
N16P-Q3-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
