NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla K20c
+16%
3.524 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000
3.031 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2012
Release Date
Feb 2017
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1076 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
160bit
208.0GB/s
Bandwidth
140.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
2496
Shading Units
1024
208
TMUs
64
40
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
36.71 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.20 GPixel/s
146.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.72 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
47.36 GFLOPS
3.524 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.031 TFLOPS
1175 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
94.72 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK110
GPU Name
GP106
GK110-885-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GP106-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
