NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c and 8GB VRAM Quadro M4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M4000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 5GB)
Lower TDP (120W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla K20c
+36%
3.524 TFLOPS
Quadro M4000
2.573 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Tesla K20c
55
Quadro M4000
+1%
56
Graphics Card
Nov 2012
Release Date
Jun 2015
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
208.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
2496
Shading Units
1664
208
TMUs
104
40
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
36.71 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
49.47 GPixel/s
146.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
80.39 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.524 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.573 TFLOPS
1175 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
80.39 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
120W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK110
GPU Name
GM204
GK110-885-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GM204-850-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
