NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c and 0GB VRAM Quadro 5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 120.0GB/s)
2144 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 5000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (152W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla K20c
+388%
3.524 TFLOPS
Quadro 5000
0.722 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2012
Release Date
Feb 2011
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
320bit
208.0GB/s
Bandwidth
120.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
11
2496
Shading Units
352
208
TMUs
44
40
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
640 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
36.71 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.29 GPixel/s
146.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.57 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.524 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
722.3 GFLOPS
1175 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
361.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
152W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK110
GPU Name
GF100
GK110-885-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
