NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 6GB VRAM RTX A3000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1230MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
RTX A3000 Mobile
+656%
10.08 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Apr 2021
Tesla
Generation
Ampere-MW
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
600 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1230 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
32
512
Shading Units
4096
64
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
78.72 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.08 TFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.08 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
70W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GA104
-
-
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
