NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090
+177%
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000D
0.48 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Oct 2011
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
4
512
Shading Units
192
64
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
62W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
