Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M

NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 512MB VRAM Quadro NVS 140M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
432 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 247W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075 +3853%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 140M
0.026 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
May 2007
Tesla
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
783 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
16
56
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
G86
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
G86-740-A2
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Board Design

247W
TDP
10W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy