NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 12GB VRAM Quadro M6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Lower TDP (247W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro M6000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1114MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
2624 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro M6000
+565%
6.844 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Mar 2015
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
988 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1114 MHz
783 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
317.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
3072
56
TMUs
192
48
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
106.9 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
213.9 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.844 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
213.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
247W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GM200
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
8 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
601 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
