Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000

NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (122W vs 247W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000 +110%
2.169 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Aug 2012
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
783 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
1536
56
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.59 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
90.37 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.169 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
90.37 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GK104
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

247W
TDP
122W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy