Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro 6000

NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro 6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 6GB VRAM Quadro 6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 143.4GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro 6000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 247W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro 6000
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Dec 2010
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
783 MHz
Memory Clock
747 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
143.4GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
448
56
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GF100
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

247W
TDP
204W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy