NVIDIA Tesla C2070 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2070 and 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 143.4GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 238W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2070
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
+353%
4.666 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
May 2019
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
600 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
747 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
143.4GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
30
448
Shading Units
1920
56
TMUs
120
48
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.76 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
145.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.331 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.666 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
145.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
238W
TDP
60W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
TU106
-
-
-
Fermi
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
