NVIDIA Tesla C2070 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2070 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla C2070 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (143.4GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
432 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 238W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2070
+2837%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Mar 2009
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
747 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
143.4GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
2
448
Shading Units
16
56
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
238W
TDP
34W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
G96
-
-
-
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
