NVIDIA Tesla C2070 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2070 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla C2070 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (143.4GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 238W)
Score
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Mar 2007
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-III
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
747 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
143.4GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
-
56
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.200 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
238W
TDP
45W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
G71
-
-
-
Fermi
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
90 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
0.278 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0
