NVIDIA Tesla C2070 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2070 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla C2070 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (143.4GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
416 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 238W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2070
+1642%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Sep 2007
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
747 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
143.4GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
4
448
Shading Units
32
56
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.680 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.360 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
58.88 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
238W
TDP
42W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
G84-875-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
