NVIDIA Tesla C2070 vs NVIDIA Quadro 600
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2070 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla C2070 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (143.4GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
352 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 238W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2070
+317%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro 600
0.246 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Dec 2010
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
747 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
143.4GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
2
448
Shading Units
96
56
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.560 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.24 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
245.8 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
20.48 GFLOPS
Board Design
238W
TDP
40W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GF108
-
-
-
Fermi
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
