NVIDIA Tesla C2070 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2070 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla C2070 's Advantages
Lower TDP (238W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 143.4GB/s)
7232 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2070
1.028 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T
+1244%
13.82 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Jan 2021
Tesla
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
747 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
143.4GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
7680
56
TMUs
240
48
ROPs
120
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS
Board Design
238W
TDP
500W
550 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Fermi
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
8 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5
