NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1404MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 238W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro P3200 Max Q
+389%
5.032 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Feb 2018
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1139 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1404 MHz
750 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
144.0GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
14
448
Shading Units
1792
56
TMUs
112
48
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.86 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
78.62 GFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.032 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
238W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GP104
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
