NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 and 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.0GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 238W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2050
+111%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Jun 2011
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
750 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
144.0GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
8
448
Shading Units
256
56
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
238W
TDP
142W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GF100
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
