NVIDIA Tesla C1060 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Tesla C1060 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
784 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 188W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C1060
0.622 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+487%
3.656 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2009
Release Date
May 2019
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1575 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
16
240
Shading Units
1024
80
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
19.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.12 GPixel/s
48.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
114.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.311 TFLOPS
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.656 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
114.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
188W
TDP
60W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
