NVIDIA Tegra 4 GPU vs AMD FirePro A300
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Tegra 4 GPU and 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tegra 4 GPU 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (20W vs 65W)
AMD FirePro A300 's Advantages
Boost Clock905MHz
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Aug 2013
Release Date
Jun 2012
Tegra
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
IGP
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
760 MHz
-
Boost Clock
905 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
384
4
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.688 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.240 GPixel/s
2.688 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.72 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
695.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
20W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Wayne
GPU Name
Devastator
Tegra 4
GPU Variant
A300
VLIW Vec4
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
32 nm
0.011 billion
Transistors
1.303 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
246 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
ES 3.0
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
5.0
