NVIDIA T600 vs AMD FireStream 9170
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM T600 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T600 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 105W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
T600
+243%
1.709 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Nov 2007
Quadro
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
735 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
10
SM Count
-
640
Shading Units
320
40
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
53.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
3.418 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.709 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
53.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
105W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
RV670
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
