NVIDIA T600 vs AMD FirePro V5900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM T600 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T600 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
T600
+178%
1.709 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
May 2011
Quadro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
735 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
10
SM Count
-
640
Shading Units
512
40
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
53.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
3.418 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.709 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
53.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Cayman
-
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0
