NVIDIA T600 vs ATI FirePro V4800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM T600 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T600 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
240 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 69W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
T600
+175%
1.709 TFLOPS
FirePro V4800
0.62 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Apr 2010
Quadro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
735 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
5
10
SM Count
-
640
Shading Units
400
40
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.200 GPixel/s
53.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.50 GTexel/s
3.418 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.709 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
620.0 GFLOPS
53.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
40W
TDP
69W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Redwood
-
GPU Variant
Redwood XT GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0
