NVIDIA T600 vs AMD FirePro RG220A
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM T600 and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T600 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
560 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 40W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
T600
+2036%
1.709 TFLOPS
FirePro RG220A
0.08 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
May 2010
Quadro
Generation
FirePro Remote
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
735 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
1
10
SM Count
-
640
Shading Units
80
40
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
53.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
3.418 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.709 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
53.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
40W
TDP
35W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
M93
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
