NVIDIA T600 Mobile vs AMD FirePro M6000
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM T600 Mobile and 2GB VRAM FirePro M6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T600 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 43W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
T600 Mobile
+146%
2.527 TFLOPS
FirePro M6000
1.024 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Jul 2012
Quadro Turing-M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
780 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
640
56
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
45.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.80 GPixel/s
78.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.00 GTexel/s
5.053 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.527 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1024 GFLOPS
78.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
64.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
43W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Heathrow
-
GPU Variant
Heathrow XT GL
(216-0835033)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
