NVIDIA T600 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM T600 Max Q and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T600 Max-Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 34% (1395MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 40W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
T600 Max Q
+213%
2.5 TFLOPS
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Turing-M
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
937 MHz
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
3
896
Shading Units
384
56
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
44.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.61 GPixel/s
78.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.91 GTexel/s
5.000 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.46 GFLOPS
2.500 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
797.2 GFLOPS
78.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.91 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GP108B
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
6.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
