NVIDIA T600 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM T600 Max Q and 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 755M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T600 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
T600 Max Q
+232%
2.5 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 755M
0.753 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro Turing-M
Generation
GeForce 700M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
86.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
384
56
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
44.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.840 GPixel/s
78.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.36 GTexel/s
5.000 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.500 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
752.6 GFLOPS
78.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GT 755M
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
