NVIDIA T600 Max-Q vs AMD FirePro M4100
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM T600 Max Q and 2GB VRAM FirePro M4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T600 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
T600 Max Q
+386%
2.5 TFLOPS
FirePro M4100
0.514 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Oct 2013
Quadro Turing-M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
384
56
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
44.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.360 GPixel/s
78.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.08 GTexel/s
5.000 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.500 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
514.6 GFLOPS
78.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
32.16 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Mars
-
GPU Variant
Mars M2 PRO/LP
(216-0842009)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
