NVIDIA T600 Max-Q vs AMD FirePro M3100
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM T600 Max Q and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T600 Max-Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 99% (1395MHz vs 700MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
T600 Max Q
+365%
2.5 TFLOPS
FirePro M3100
0.537 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Turing-M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
650 MHz
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
700 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
384
56
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
44.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.600 GPixel/s
78.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.80 GTexel/s
5.000 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.500 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
537.6 GFLOPS
78.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
40W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Mars
-
GPU Variant
Mars M2 LP
(216-0842009)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
