NVIDIA T400 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM T400 and 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 250W)
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 79% (2550MHz vs 1425MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
12416 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
T400
1.094 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+5867%
65.28 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2021
Release Date
Aug 2023
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
420 MHz
Base Clock
1155 MHz
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
2550 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
6
SM Count
100
384
Shading Units
12800
24
TMUs
400
16
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
400
-
RT Cores
100
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
448.8 GPixel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1020 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
65.28 TFLOPS
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
65.28 TFLOPS
34.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1020 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102
Turing
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.7
