NVIDIA T400 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM T400 and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 130W)
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 53% (2175MHz vs 1425MHz)
More VRAM (20GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
5760 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
T400
1.094 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+2343%
26.73 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2021
Release Date
Aug 2023
Quadro
Generation
Workstation Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
420 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
2175 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
160bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
360.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
6
SM Count
48
384
Shading Units
6144
24
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
139.2 GPixel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
417.6 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
26.73 TFLOPS
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
26.73 TFLOPS
34.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
417.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
130W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
AD104
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
