NVIDIA T400 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI308X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM T400 and 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI308X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 750W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI308X 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 47% (2100MHz vs 1425MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
19072 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
T400
1.094 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI308X
+7369%
81.72 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2021
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
420 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM3
64bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
304
6
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
19456
24
TMUs
1216
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
22.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2554 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
34.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
750W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1150 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
153 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
N/A
