NVIDIA T400 vs NVIDIA NVS 310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM T400 and 512MB VRAM NVS 310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
336 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 30W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
T400
+994%
1.094 TFLOPS
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2021
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
420 MHz
Base Clock
-
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
6
SM Count
1
384
Shading Units
48
24
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
34.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
20W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GF119
-
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
Turing
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
