NVIDIA T400 vs AMD FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM T400 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
416 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
T400
+9%
1.094 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2021
Release Date
Jun 2008
Quadro
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
420 MHz
Base Clock
-
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
6
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
800
24
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
34.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
