NVIDIA T400 vs AMD FirePro R5000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM T400 and 2GB VRAM FirePro R5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro R5000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
T400
1.094 TFLOPS
FirePro R5000
+15%
1.267 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2021
Release Date
Feb 2013
Quadro
Generation
FirePro Remote
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
420 MHz
Base Clock
-
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
6
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
34.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Pitcairn
-
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
