NVIDIA T400 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM T400 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
344 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 32W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
T400
+3318%
1.094 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2021
Release Date
Jan 2009
Quadro
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
420 MHz
Base Clock
-
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
6
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
40
24
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
34.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
30W
TDP
32W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
RV620
-
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
