NVIDIA T400 vs ATI FireGL V8600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM T400 and 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock1425MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 159W)
ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
T400
+148%
1.094 TFLOPS
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2021
Release Date
May 2007
Quadro
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
420 MHz
Base Clock
-
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR4
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
6
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
320
24
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
34.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
30W
TDP
159W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
R600
-
GPU Variant
R600 V8600
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
80 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
