NVIDIA T400 vs Intel Arc A310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM T400 and 4GB VRAM Arc A310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 23% (1750MHz vs 1425MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
T400
1.094 TFLOPS
Arc A310
+145%
2.688 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2021
Release Date
Oct 2022
Quadro
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
420 MHz
Base Clock
1750 MHz
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
6
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.376 TFLOPS
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
34.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
30W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
