Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA T400 4 GB vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700X

NVIDIA T400 4 GB vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM T400 4 GB and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5700X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA T400 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (30W vs 205W)
AMD Radeon Pro W5700X 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 43% (2040MHz vs 1425MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
T400 4 GB
1.094 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W5700X +854%
10.44 TFLOPS
Blender
T400 4 GB
210
Radeon Pro W5700X +315%
872
VS

Graphics Card

May 2021
Release Date
Dec 2019
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

420 MHz
Base Clock
1243 MHz
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

6
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
40
384
Shading Units
2560
24
TMUs
160
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

22.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.6 GPixel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
326.4 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
20.89 TFLOPS
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.44 TFLOPS
34.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
652.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Navi 10
-
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
205W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy