NVIDIA T400 4 GB vs Moore Threads MTT S2000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM T400 4 GB and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T400 4 GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock1425MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
T400 4 GB
1.094 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+873%
10.65 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2021
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
420 MHz
Base Clock
1300 MHz
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
6
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
4096
24
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
256
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.8 GPixel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.8 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.30 TFLOPS
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.65 TFLOPS
34.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
166.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
Unknown
200 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5
