NVIDIA T1000 vs ATI Radeon X1700 FSC
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM T1000 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1700 FSC to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T1000 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 22.24GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1700 FSC 's Advantages
Lower TDP (44W vs 50W)
Score
Graphics Card
May 2021
Release Date
Nov 2007
Quadro Turing
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1065 MHz
Base Clock
-
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.24GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
-
56
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
44.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.348 GPixel/s
78.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.348 GTexel/s
5.000 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.500 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
78.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
44W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
RV535
-
GPU Variant
RV535 FSC
Turing
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
80 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.33 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
131 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
3.0
