NVIDIA T1000 vs AMD FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM T1000 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T1000 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
96 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
T1000
+150%
2.5 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2021
Release Date
Jun 2008
Quadro Turing
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1065 MHz
Base Clock
-
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
800
56
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
44.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
78.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
5.000 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.500 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
78.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.1
