NVIDIA T1000 vs Intel Arc A770
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM T1000 and 16GB VRAM Arc A770 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T1000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 225W)
Intel Arc A770 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 72% (2400MHz vs 1395MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
T1000
2.5 TFLOPS
Arc A770
+686%
19.66 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
T1000
3073
Arc A770
+341%
13560
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
T1000
1406
Arc A770
+364%
6525
Blender
T1000
383
Arc A770
+498%
2292
Graphics Card
May 2021
Release Date
Oct 2022
Quadro Turing
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1065 MHz
Base Clock
2100 MHz
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
4096
56
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
44.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
307.2 GPixel/s
78.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
614.4 GTexel/s
5.000 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
39.32 TFLOPS
2.500 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.66 TFLOPS
78.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.458 TFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
