AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 91% (2700MHz vs 1410MHz)
Lower TDP (30W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU
8.294 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX
+52%
12.63 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2023
Release Date
Sep 2021
Console GPU(ASUS)
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
-
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
800 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
2700 MHz
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
16GB
LPDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
70
768
Shading Units
4480
48
TMUs
280
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
129.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
16.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
8.294 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
518.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Phoenix
GPU Name
GA100
-
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
7 nm
25.39 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
178 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
6.8
Shader Model
N/A
