NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Mobile and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Mobile 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (896.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 34% (2010MHz vs 1500MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 80W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Mobile
+86%
23.04 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
12.35 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2023
Blackwell-MW
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
975 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR7
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
896.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
60
SM Count
24
7680
Shading Units
3072
240
TMUs
96
96
ROPs
48
240
Tensor Cores
96
60
RT Cores
24
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
80W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GB203
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
Blackwell 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
45.6 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
378 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
10.1
CUDA
8.9
6.8
Shader Model
6.7
